Limio achieves SOC 2 Type II compliance - another milestone for secure omnichannel commerce
Independent validation that our controls operate over time, giving enterprise customers confidence to adopt Limio for business critical commerce
We are excited to announce that Limio has successfully achieved SOC 2 Type II compliance. This is a big moment for us and a clear sign of our ongoing commitment to keeping customer data safe and meeting the regulatory standards that matter to our customers.
Security has always been core to Limio. We have held PCI compliance for several years, and as our platform has grown to support business critical omnichannel commerce for more global and US customers, we wanted our security to match that growth. Achieving SOC 2 Type II is a meaningful step that proves the robustness, security and scale of our platform.
We worked with Insight Assurance on a thorough audit to validate our controls over time, and we are proud to have met the SOC 2 Type II standard. Their independent assessment gives our customers and partners the confidence that our practices are not only well designed but operating effectively.
SOC 2 Type II gives independent assurance that our controls work consistently, which helps enterprise buyers and procurement teams move faster when evaluating Limio. The process also helped us tighten how we operate day to day - everything from continuous control monitoring to clearer incident response and stronger operational practices. The result is less friction for customers, more predictable and reliable integrations delivered by our cross-functional teams, and an overall stronger data security posture as we work with larger and more regulated organisations.
A big thank you to Insight Assurance for their rigour and impartial evaluation, and to our teams for the effort that drove this across the line. We will keep investing in security and compliance so Limio remains a dependable partner for businesses building subscription commerce at scale.
If you would like to receive a copy of Limio's SOC 2 Type II report, please head to our Trust Centre. Thank you to our customers and partners for your continued support.
Other posts you may like
13 Reasons Not to Build Your Own Commerce Infrastructure (Buy It Instead!)
Thinking of building your own subscription commerce infrastructure?
We get it. You’ve got a sharp team, a long backlog, and a dream of total control. But before you unleash your engineers on yet another internal tool that will quietly become everyone’s problem in 12 months, let us save you the pain. At Limio, we’ve seen the movie (and the sequel, and the reboot). We help SaaS companies monetise across product-led, sales-led, and partner-led channels — and we’ve met plenty of brave souls who tried to build it all themselves. This blog is our tongue-in-cheek but painfully real guide to why that path often leads to delays, hidden costs, and late-night Slack meltdowns. Here are 13 reasons why building your own commerce stack might not be the genius move it seems — and why buying one might just save your roadmap, your budget, and your sanity.
Commerce Infrastructure: The Missing Piece in the SaaS Growth Stack
The SaaS landscape has transformed dramatically over the past decade. What began as simple subscription models with standard pricing tiers and single sales motion has evolved into a complex ecosystem of hybrid pricing and go-to-market strategies that demand entirely new approaches to monetization. Yet many companies are still relying on billing infrastructure designed for a simpler era.
Other posts you may like
13 Reasons Not to Build Your Own Commerce Infrastructure (Buy It Instead!)
Thinking of building your own subscription commerce infrastructure?
We get it. You’ve got a sharp team, a long backlog, and a dream of total control. But before you unleash your engineers on yet another internal tool that will quietly become everyone’s problem in 12 months, let us save you the pain. At Limio, we’ve seen the movie (and the sequel, and the reboot). We help SaaS companies monetise across product-led, sales-led, and partner-led channels — and we’ve met plenty of brave souls who tried to build it all themselves. This blog is our tongue-in-cheek but painfully real guide to why that path often leads to delays, hidden costs, and late-night Slack meltdowns. Here are 13 reasons why building your own commerce stack might not be the genius move it seems — and why buying one might just save your roadmap, your budget, and your sanity.
Commerce Infrastructure: The Missing Piece in the SaaS Growth Stack
The SaaS landscape has transformed dramatically over the past decade. What began as simple subscription models with standard pricing tiers and single sales motion has evolved into a complex ecosystem of hybrid pricing and go-to-market strategies that demand entirely new approaches to monetization. Yet many companies are still relying on billing infrastructure designed for a simpler era.
When PLG Meets Enterprise Sales: The Billing Stack Built for a Single Motion
Creative software companies that grew up on PLG are adding enterprise sales—and discovering their billing stack disagrees. We explore why 60% of PLG initiatives fail, and how unified commerce layers solve the hybrid motion challenge.
.jpg)
Which platforms allow you to unify sales-assisted and product-led growth (PLG) motions?
Modern businesses often need to support sales-assisted deals (via sales reps and CRM) and product-led growth (via self-serve web purchases). Achieving this means integrating your Salesforce CRM with e-commerce/self-service capabilities like Limio, CPQ tools, and a backend billing system. Let's dive in the options.
RevOps at Scale: Connecting PLG, Sales, and Partners in One Flow
In SaaS, revenue growth depends on multiple channels — product-led, sales-led, and partner-led — yet most companies manage each in isolation. This fragmentation forces RevOps teams to juggle disconnected tools like Salesforce, Zuora, and partner portals, slowing growth and creating friction for customers. A connected RevOps model changes that. By unifying offers, quotes, and orders across all channels, companies can deliver consistent pricing, seamless buying experiences, and real-time data synchronisation. The result is fewer leaks, faster revenue cycles, and RevOps teams that focus on scaling rather than fixing broken processes.